Sorafenib is the standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to
the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. However, because of its unsatisfactory
efficacy, adverse effects, and high cost, the use of sorafenib is limited, and other treatment
modalities are required. Recent studies reported that treatment modalities other than
sorafenib, such as hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transarterial radioembolization,
showed comparable or better response rates and survival rates than sorafenib. In this review,
treatment modalities that could be used as alternatives to sorafenib will be discussed. (J Liver
Cancer 2016;16:1-6)
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Phase I Radiation Dose-Escalation Study to Investigate the Dose-Limiting Toxicity of Concurrent Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Yeona Cho, Jun Won Kim, Ja Kyung Kim, Kwan Sik Lee, Jung Il Lee, Hyun Woong Lee, Kwang-Hun Lee, Seung-Moon Joo, Jin Hong Lim, Ik Jae Lee Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1612. CrossRef
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the first line treatment option
for the patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC), however, treatment strategy and evaluation of effects after TACE has not been fully
established. Recently, sub-stage of BCLC stage B has been proposed and validated, but it
should be validated including a large number of the patients and its refinement should be
discussed. We have validated the sub-stage of BCLC stage B (B1-B4) by comparing overall
survival after TACE, and there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival
after TACE between B1 and B2. After excluding the patients with Child-Pugh point 7 from B1,
the overall survival was significantly better than that of B2. Therefore, up-to-seven criteria is
shown to be a reliable tool for the treatment strategy in the patients with intermediate stage
of HCC. Refinement of sub-stage of BCLC stage B has been proposed by some other institutes,
and it is important to establish novel treatment strategy for the patients with BCLC stage B
after TACE to improve the prognosis of the patients after TACE, and to define the best timing
for conversion to sorafenib or liver transplantation should be discussed. (J Liver Cancer
2016;16:7-11)
Sorafenib, the first-approved molecular targeted agent (MTA), is actively used in patients with
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Accumulating experiences suggest
that the efficacy of this drug is modest and the adverse events are not minimal, although
those are manageable. Given that newer drugs targeting various molecules involved in
hepatocarcinogenesis have been failed to show efficacy compared with sorafenib, the
perspectives regarding development of novel MTA appear to be gloomy. Nonetherless, it is
necessary to maximize the efficacy of sorafenib by combining this drug with locoregional
therapies and by finding biomarkers predicting the outcomes of patients treated with
sorafenib. A series of data indicate that combining sorafenib and locoregional therapies
including transarterial chemoemolization could improve patients outcome. Unfortunately,
there has been no biomarkers identified which could predict the response to sorafenib. Global
investigation of therapeutic decisions in HCC and of its treatment with sorafeNib (GIDEON)
is a global, non-interventional, observational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of
sorafenib, particularly in patients with Child-Pugh B. The final report of GIDEON study is going
to be published soon, and the Korean GIDEON data suggest that sorafenib in patients with
decreased liver function might be safe and effective as in patients with Child-Pugh A. The way
to conquer HCC using molecular approach is still long and the era of immune-oncology seems
to get started. (Journal of Liver Cancer 2016;16:12-16)
Background/Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)
intermediate stage includes a highly heterogeneous population. Here, we aimed to subclassify
hepatocellular carcinoma with BCLC intermediate stage for better prognostification. Methods Between 2003 and 2008, 325 patients who were newly diagnosed as HCC with
BCLC intermediate stage were considered eligible. Tumor factor and liver function were used
for sub-classification. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method with a
comparison by log-rank test. Results A total of 325 patients with intermediate stage HCC were analyzed. Patients with
tumor size ≥7 cm, tumor number ≥4 and Child-Pugh class B had the worse OS compared
to those with tumor size <7 cm, tumor number <4 and Child-pugh class A, respectively (all
P<0.05). These three variables affected the OS independently from multivariate Cox regression
analysis (all P<0.05). So, using these three variables, patients were finally sub-classified as
those with fulfilling none of three factors (B-a), one of three factors (B-b), two of three factors
(B-c) and all of three factors (B-d) with the median OS of 39.2, 20.6, 12.0 and 8.3 months with
statistical significances (all P<0.05 between B-a and B-b, between B-b and B-c, and between
B-c and B-d), respectively. Conclusions Sub-classification of HCC with BCLC intermediate stage may be useful in not only
prognostification but also guidance of treatment strategies. (J Liver Cancer 2016;16:17-22)
Background/Aims Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) help reduce the recurrence rate after
the curative treatment of hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib has
been shown to improve survival of advanced HCC patients. Whether antiviral therapy with
NAs could help such patients is unknown. Our aim is to investigate the usefulness of antiviral
therapy for advanced-stage HCC treated with sorafenib.
Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in advanced-stage HCC patients
treated with sorafenib between June 2007 and December 2013. Patients in group A (the nonantiviral
therapy group) were treated with sorafenib alone. Those in group B (the antiviral
therapy group) were treated with sorafenib and NAs. Progression-free survival (PS) and overall
survival (OS) were compared between these two groups.
Results Finally, 23 patients in group A and 40 patients in group B were enrolled in the study.
The mean number of days of treatment with sorafenib was 79 (34-231) days and 96 (33-449)
days for group A and B, respectively (P=0.286). The mean PS of group A and B was 97 (14-449)
days and 51 (0-461) days, respectively (P=0.068). The OS was 154 (44-741) days in group A and
138 (30-1,025) days in group B (P=0.665). PS and OS showed no significant difference between
the two groups.
Conclusions This study shows that there was no significant survival gain of using antiviral
therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC treated with sorafenib. In consideration of costeffectiveness,
antiviral therapy may be not mandatory. (J Liver Cancer 2016;16:23-30)
Background/Aims When hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is exposed to hypoxic condition,
HIF-1α is activated and results in angiogenesis and increased tumor burden. Although
inhibition of HIF-1α may reduce tumor growth, there are some limitations to control tumor
growth completely. For a more effective therapy for HCC, we investigated HIF-1α independent
pathway related tumor growth with angiogenesis. Methods We cultured HepG2 cells (HCC cell line) in both normoxia and hypoxia conditions.
These cells were divided into three groups: a echinomycin treated group, a echinomycin and
quinazoline treated group and a control group without any treatments. Growth morphologies
of cells were observed with a microscope after 24 hours. Immunocytochemistry assay
was done to detect the angiogenesis during inhibition of HIF-1α and/or NF-κB in hypoxia
condition, and compared with results in normoxia condition. Results In normoxia, the expression of HIF-1α on tumor growth was not found. In hypoxia,
inhibition of HIF-1α reduced the tumor growth compared to the control group. But, inhibition
of both HIF-1α and NF-κB did not show apparent reduction of tumor growth as shown in HIF-
1α only group. Conclusions Signaling pathways related to cancer cell growth exist through a vast network.
Inhibition of one target molecule may result in over-expression of other molecules related
to the tumor growth. For an effective therapy in blocking of the tumor growth, more
comprehensive understanding of the network related to signaling pathways on tumor growth
is necessary. (J Liver Cancer 2016;16:31-37)
Brain metastasis is a rare condition of extraheptaic metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC). Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and brain metastasis have rapidly worsened
neurologic signs and symptoms, therefore it is regarded to oncologic emergency. Current
recommended treatments for brain metastasis are surgical resection or gamma-knife surgery
with/without whole brain radiation therapy (RT). However, patients with brain metastasis
have a very poor prognosis after adequate treatment. Here, we report a 62-year-old man with
HCC and brain metastasis who had long term survival after surgical resection and whole brain
RT. (J Liver Cancer 2016;16:38-41)
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) shows a poor prognosis with high recurrence rate even after
surgical resection. To improve prognosis of HCC patient, regular surveillance for high-risk
group is recommended, but cost-benefit of the surveillance under 40 years old Asian male
with hepatitis B infection is unclear. We share a 39-year-old male case which showed early
recurrence and rapid extrahepatic metastasis after surgical resection for single huge HCC.
Based on the pathologic finding, this case was diagnosed with ‘stemness’-related markerexpressing
HCC. Further molecular classification for HCC could be beneficial to estimate
individual risk for HCC recurrence and to predict prognosis.
Current guidelines recommend sorafenib as the first-line molecular target agent for advanced
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastasis and unresectable HCC. Sorafenib
was reported to show survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC. However, complete
response is extremely rare in patients treated with sorafenib. Here, we report a 52-year-old
man with advanced HCC and pulmonary metastasis who showed complete response by
sequential transarterial chemoembolization and continuous sorafenib. Complete response
was sustained for 53-month until now.
Despite recent advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis
of patients with extrahepatic metastasis from HCC still remains dismal. The current study
presents a case of HCC that was metastatic to the pelvis and describes successful treatment
with multidisciplinary approach to the skeletal metastasis. The patient was a 67-year-old
male who presented with right pelvic pain 28 months following right hepatectomy for HCC.
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging indicated a solitary bone metastasis
without intrahepatic recurrence. Complete response was achieved with multidisciplinary
management including sorafenib, transarterial embolization, surgery to remove the
metastatic mass and radiotherapy after surgery. A post-operative follow-up 15 months later
found that the patient remained in good health with maintained complete response. This case
suggests that a multidisciplinary approach can achieve long-term cancer-free survival and
prolonged life expectancy beyond palliative care for patients with solitary bone metastasis
after curative surgery for HCC.
Sorafenib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits Raf kinase and the
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor intracellular kinase pathway and is the first
agent to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in overall survival for patients
with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there were few cases of partial or
complete response reported in the previous studies. We herein report a case of dramatic
partial response in a patient who had advanced HCC with multiple lung metastasis and portal
vein thrombosis treated with sorafenib.
Surgical resection is mainstay treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its
prognosis is poor, because of the high incidence of HCC recurrence (cumulative 5-year HCC
recurrence rate of 70-80%). The most common site of HCC recurrence is the remnant liver, and
extrahepatic recurrence occurs in 6.7-13.5% of patients. Because the tumor characteristics in
extrahepatic recurrence are usually multiple and aggressive, the optimal treatment modality
has not yet been determined. We report a case of complete remission and long term survival
over 60 months in patient with extrahepatic metastasis after curative resection of HCC
by aggressive treatment, which include lung resection for lung metastasis, radiotherapy
for mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and systemic chemotherapy.
This paper (“A case of rapid progression of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation” by Lee K, et al from
Journal of Liver Cancer 2015;15(2):118-121) has been retracted because of the several figures (Fig. 1A, Fig. 3A, and Fig. 4) of
the paper1 were identical to those of the previous published original article2 without agreement of the copyright holder.
The authors informed that they will take full responsibility for this unintended duplicate publication of figures caused by
lack of communication, and wish to apologize to readers of the journal for any convenience.
To preserve scientific integrity, Journal of Liver Cancer agreed with the authors that this paper be retracted.