Although surgical resection can provide best treatment outcome with curative intent,
patients with relatively early stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can get benefit of this
treatment. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system limits surgical resection to
patients with single HCC with well-preserved liver function, which is often challenged in real
practice, especially from Asian countries. During last two decades, surgical outcomes have
made remarkable progress approaching zero mortality in many reports. In this review, areas
that surgical indications can be expanded beyond BCLC staging system will be discussed,
especially in Asian population. (Journal of Liver Cancer 2015;15:1-3)
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is decided according to the evidence
base recommendations generated by international societies especially by Barcelona clinical
liver cancer (BCLC) guideline. However, the BCLC guideline based on studies of the Western
countries, has not been well matched to real life cohort in Korea. In Western countries,
a deceased donor liver transplantation has been well allocated to the HCC patients with
preserved liver function. Patients with mild to moderate portal hypertension and certain
BCLC B patients could be eligible for hepatic resection if a chance for 50% survival rate at 5
years is perceived. If liver transplantation (LT) is back up for liver resection in those patients
as a salvage therapy, widening indication of liver resection could be much easily acceptable.
On the other hands, new selection criteria of HCC beyond Milan criteria considering tumor
biology, has been provided in the field of LT resulting in more than 50% survival rate at 5
years. Herein, surgical perspectives beyond the BCLC recommendation for LT for HCC would
be reviewed in the respect of Korean surgeon’s view in this article.
Yttrium-90 radioembolization has emerged as a novel therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) of intermediate or advanced stage. Yttrium-90 has characteristics of short half-life and
tissue penetration depth. Potent anti-cancer effect by this isotope enables to kill the tumor
for 6 months after administration. Although transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the
standard modality for multinodular HCC without vascular invasion, big size or numerous nodules
does not allow enough treatment effect of TACE. Post-embolization syndrome resulting
poor quality of life, liver dysfunction and hepatic arterial damage are other pitfalls of TACE.
In several studies, radioembolization showed survival comparable to TACE, shorter hospital
stay and less treatment sessions. In advanced HCC with portal vein invasion, radioembolization
demonstrated similar or better survival compared with sorafenib. The atrophy of lobe
treated by radioembolization and hypertrophy in the contralateral lobe can be called radiation
lobectomy, which makes it possible to perform a following curative therapy. The role of
radioembolization in unresectable HCC in terms of downstaging or bridge to transplantation
needs to be further studied. Radioembolization is contraindicated in HCC patients with main
portal vein occlusion and with poor liver function. The International guidelines for HCC have
some limitations and thus rooms for radioembolization to be incorporated.
Young Youn Cho, Jung Hee Kwon, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jeong Min Lee, Jae Young Lee, Hyo-Choel Kim, Jin Wook Chung, Won-mook Choi, Eun Ju Cho, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Chung Yong Kim, Hyo-Suk Lee
J Liver Cancer. 2015;15(1):19-29. Published online March 31, 2015
Background/Aims This study compared the outcomes of patients with small hepatocellular
carcinomas (HCCs) who were treated using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or
radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective study that evaluated the diagnostic
efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). We analyzed
41 small hepatic nodules in 32 patients that showed typical radiologic hallmarks on both CT
and gadoxate-enhanced MRI (typical nodules) and 25 small hepatic nodules from 22 patients
that showed atypical radiologic hallmarks on CT and typical radiologic hallmarks on MRI
(discrepant nodules). Results There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients
with typical and discrepant nodules. Complete response rates 1 month after TACE or RFA were
75.0% (18/24) and 94.1% (16/17; P=0.20), respectively, for the patients with typical nodules
and 58.8% (10/17) and 100% (8/8; P=0.05), respectively, for the patients with discrepant
nodules. Treatment failure rates after TACE or RFA were 33.3% (8/24) and 5.8% (1/17; P=0.15),
respectively, for the patients with typical nodules and 47.0% (8/17) and 0.0% (0/8; P=0.02),
respectively, for the patients with discrepant nodules. Among patients achieving complete
response, there were no significant differences in the risk of marginal recurrence. Conclusions RFA provided higher complete response rates and significantly lower treatment failure rates than TACE for patients with discrepant nodules of HCC. Therefore, a treatment
modality such as RFA may be preferable for small HCCs which show discrepancy on two
imaging modalities.
Background/Aims Loss of liver fatty acid binding protein (LFABP) expression by immunohistochemistry
is a useful marker for the identification of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α (HNF1α)-
inactivated hepatocellular adenomas; however, the expression status of LFABP in hepatocellular
carcinomas (HCCs) is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the expression status of LFABP
in HCCs and examine the clinicopathological characteristics of LFABP-negative HCCs. Methods Immunohistochemical stains LFABP, K19 (mouse monoclonal, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark)
and EpCAM (mouse monoclonal, Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) were performed
on tissue microarray sections from 188 surgically resected HCCs, and the association between
LFABP expression status and the clinicopathological features, survival and “stemness”-related
marker expression status were analyzed. Results Loss of LFABP expression was noted in 30 (16%) out of 188 HCCs. LFABP-negative
HCCs were associated with a decreased recurrence-free survival (LFABP-negative: 17.0 ± 4.84
months [95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.5–26.5 months] versus LFABP-positive: 51.0 ± 8.7
months [95% CI: 34.0–68.0 months]; P=0.004). HCCs with LFABP expression loss were more
frequently larger and showed more frequent vascular invasion, although not statistically significant;
and an inverse correlation was seen between LFABP expression and K19 expression
status (P=0.001). Conclusions Loss of LFABP expression is seen in HCCs, and is associated with a decreased
recurrence-free survival.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Hepatocellular adenomas: recent updates Haeryoung Kim, Young Nyun Park Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2021; 55(3): 171. CrossRef
A hemangioma is the most common benign hepatic tumor. Many hepatic hemangioma tend
to be found incidentally, but should be differentiated from malignant tumors, especially in
patients with a high risk for malignancy. We presented a 52-year-old woman who diagnosed
as hepatic hemangioma. The patient was a chronic alcohol abuser and diagnosed as a hepatic
C virus carrier for the first time. Contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT)
revealed a 4cm sized hepatic mass involving both segment 5 and 6. Abdominal CT finding
suggested hepatic hemangioma, but could not rule out the malignancy. Because the patient
had risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma, abdominal ultrasonography (US) was performed
for further evaluation. But abdominal US also showed atypical finding. For the confirmative
diagnosis, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using gadoxetate disodium (primovist®,
Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany) which is the innovative liver cell-specific contrast medium
was done, and the patient was diagnosed as hepatic hemangioma.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually associated with chronic liver disease such as
liver cirrhosis. Primary HCC lesions and even recurrent intrahepatic lesions can be treated
successfully by using variable modalities applicable to intrahepatic lesions. HCC can cause
intrahepatic multiple occurrence and extrahepatic metastasis. Extrahepatic metastasis occurs
in up to about 60% of patients of HCC, and a major of patients with extrahepatic HCC had late
intrahepatic stage of tumor. Themost frequent site of extrahepatic metastasis of HCC was the
lung. HCC metastasized to soft tissues was unusually reported. Extrahepatic metastasis of
HCC, especially to unusual site, should not be overlooked and must be able to be controlled.
We experienced a case that HCC was metastasized to the pronator quadratus muscle of right
wrist and chould be removed surgically.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver malignancy. Spontaneous
regression of HCC is extremely rare phenomenon and mechanism of regression remains obscure.
75-year-old woman previously diagnosed with hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis
was found to have single mass in liver with elevation of α-fetoprotein level to 10,320 ng/mL.
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed. 27 months after TACE recurred HCC
with multiple lung nodules were confirmed. The patient refused any therapeutic modality.
The patient underwent follow-up without any anti-cancer treatment. 8 months after recurrence
follow up computed tomography scan revealed spontaneous regression of HCC and
completely disappeared lung nodules. The patient is currently doing well and without any
evidence of recurrence. The causes of spontaneous regression of HCC are not well understood.
Proposed mechanisms are ischemic injury, biological factors, herbal medicine, immunological
variations. Further studies are necessary to improve our understanding of this rare phenomenon.
Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT)
have an extremely poor prognosis. Although the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guideline
recommends sorafenib in advanced HCC with PVT, which has provided survival benefits of
2 or 3 months compared to the placebo group, many liver cancer centers in Asia still select
multimodality approaches including transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency
ablation, radiation therapy (RT) as well as systemic/intra-arterial chemotherapy. Recently
advanced RT technologies have shown potential to improve survival without severe radiationrelated
toxicity. For locally advanced HCC patients with PVT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy
(CCRT) has been applied as a loco-regional treatment and provides potential cures. We herein
report our recent experience of a patient accompanying large HCC with PVT who successfully
undergone CCRT followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.
The reported prevalence of PVT is in the range of 0.6-15.8% in patient with liver cirrhosis
or portal hypertension. If the patient has hepatocellular carcinoma, thrombus is likely to be
malignant thrombus. Malignancy, frequently of hepatic origin, is responsible for 21-24% of
over all cases. The overall mortality rate of chronic PVT has been reported to be less than
10%, but is increased to 26% when associated with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis.
However, no treatment guideline has been established on anticoagulant therapy for PVT in
patients with concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Because actually it is not
easy to distinguish between malignant thrombus and benign thrombus in clinical aspect, PVT
in hepatocellular carcinoma are still debatable whether or not treatment when it diagnosed.
We present 3 cases of portal vein thrombosis successfully treated with anticoagulation in
hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis, and we include a literature review.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Evaluation of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis Patients Ji Min Han, Youngil Koh, Sung Hwan Kim, Sung Yun Suh, Yoon Sook Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Hye Sun Gwak Medicina.2023; 59(2): 292. CrossRef
Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have a poor prognosis because most
patients present with advanced disease. Although tumor size is small, ablation therapy
is difficult because it is difficult to delineate tumor boundary and tumor often combined
vascular invasion. Therefore many clinicians still try locoregional therapy (LRT) such as
transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiation therapy (RT), or combination with LRT
and sorafenib in this situation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is new technology
providing very highly conformal ablative radiation dose and is expected to salvage modality
for HCC showed incomplete response of TACE due to combined arteriovenous (AV) shunts.
Based on above suggestions, we herein offer our experience of a complete remission of tumor
by combination of SBRT and TACE in a patient with infiltrative HCC. Further study, maybe
regarding a combination of locoregional and systemic therapy is necessary on how to manage
infiltrative HCC with AV shunts.