Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an estimated 750,000 deaths in 2022. Recent emergence of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their combination therapies have been transforming HCC care, but their prognostic impact in advanced-stage disease remains unsatisfactory. In addition, their application to early-stage disease is still an unmet need. Omics profiling studies have elucidated recurrent and heterogeneously present molecular aberrations involved in pro-cancer tumor (immune) microenvironment that may guide therapeutic strategies. Recurrent aberrations such somatic mutations in TERT promoter and TP53 have been regarded undruggable, but recent studies have suggested that these may serve as new classes of therapeutic targets. HCC markers such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), glypican-3 (GPC3), and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) have also been explored as therapeutic targets. These molecular features may be utilized as biomarkers to guide the application of new approaches as companion biomarkers to maximize therapeutic benefits in patients who are likely to benefit from the therapies, while minimizing unnecessary harm in patients who will not respond. The explosive number of new agents in the pipelines have posed challenges in their clinical testing. Novel clinical trial designs guided by predictive biomarkers have been proposed to enable their efficient and cost-effective evaluation. These new developments collectively facilitate clinical translation of personalized molecular-targeted therapies in HCC and substantially improve prognosis of HCC patients.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is associated with a dismal prognosis. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is the recommended palliative treatment, and approximately 10% of the patients may experience a complete response (CR), according to the mRECIST criteria. The treatment duration is until disease progression or unacceptable side effects occur. Long-term continuation can cause potential toxicities and a substantial financial burden, making early treatment discontinuation a viable option. This report describes durable CR after discontinuing atezo-bev treatment in three patients with HCC and PVTT.
Downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically defined as the reduction in size or number of viable tumors through locoregional therapy (LRT), aiming to meet the established criteria for liver transplantation (LT). According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, a subgroup of patients with BCLC-B may benefit most from downstaging therapies. The United Network Organ Sharing downstaging protocol identifies potential candidates for downstaging by setting out ‘inclusion criteria’ and defining ‘successful downstaging.’ Additionally, the protocol considers factors related to tumor biology, such as an alphafetoprotein level <500 ng/mL after LRT. Reports indicate that successful downstaging rates following LRT are about 50%, with post- LT recurrence rates comparable to those of patients within the Milan criteria. A comprehensive multicenter US study on 10-year outcomes post-LT after downstaging showed 10-year post-LT survival and recurrence rates of 52.1% and 20.6%, respectively, for patients whose disease was downstaged; this compares to 61.5% and 13.3% for those consistently within the Milan criteria. Recently, the development of effective systemic treatments for HCC, such as immuno-oncologic agents, has provided additional opportunities for downstaging. Numerous clinical trials are exploring a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) combining LRT and systemic therapy. Although concrete evidence of the superiority of MDA for HCC downstaging is lacking, some retrospective studies and phase I and II trials have shown promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of MDA for this purpose. In this review, we will also discuss the future of MDA protocols in downstaging for improved clinical outcomes.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and aggressive cancer, mostly diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stage, at which point systemic treatment represents the only therapeutic option. Chemotherapy has been the backbone of advanced CCA treatment. More recently, immunotherapy has changed the therapeutic landscape, as immune checkpoint inhibitors have yielded the first improvement in survival and currently, the addition of either durvalumab or pembrolizumab to standard of care cisplatin plus gemcitabine represents the new first-line treatment option. However, the use of immunotherapy in subsequent lines has not demonstrated its efficacy and therefore, it is not approved, except for pembrolizumab in the selected microsatellite instability-high population. In addition, advances in comprehensive genomic profiling have led to the identification of targetable genetic alterations, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), proto-oncogene B-Raf (BRAF), neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK), rearranged during transfection (RET), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), and mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2), thus favoring the development of a precision medicine approach in previously treated patients. Despite these advances, the use of molecularly driven agents is limited to a subgroup of patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the newly approved systemic therapies, the ongoing studies, and future research challenges in advanced CCA management.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Genomic and transcriptomic signatures of sequential carcinogenesis from papillary neoplasm to biliary tract cancer Taek Chung, Seungho Oh, Jeongsoo Won, Jiho Park, Jeong Eun Yoo, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Gi Hong Choi, Chang Moo Kang, Dai Hoon Han, Sangwoo Kim, Young Nyun Park Journal of Hepatology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Is 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6 a potential molecular target for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Yong-Zhi Zhuang, Li-Quan Tong, Xue-Ying Sun World Journal of Hepatology.2024; 16(11): 1219. CrossRef
Imaging findings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for prognosis
prediction and treatment decision-making: a narrative review Jun Gu Kang, Taek Chung, Dong Kyu Kim, Hyungjin Rhee The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Resectability and survival outcome in real world practice of 720 cholangiocarcinoma patients: intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Poowanai Sarkhampee, Weeris Ouransatien, Nithi Lertsawatvicha, Satsawat Chansitthichock, Paiwan Wattanarath World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Backgrounds/Aims Although access to proton beam therapy (PBT) is limited worldwide, its use for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is gradually increasing with the expansion of new facilities. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to investigate the updated evidence of PBT for HCC.
Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that enrolled patients with liver-confined HCC that were treated with PBT for a cure up to February 2024.
Results A total of 1,858 HCC patients receiving PBT from 22 studies between 2004 and 2023 were selected for this meta-analysis. The median proportion of Child-Pugh class A was 86% (range, 41-100), and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 1.2-9.0). The median total dose ranged from 55 GyE to 76 GyE (median, 69). The pooled rates of 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival after PBT were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-91) and 86% (95% CI, 82-90), respectively. The pooled 3- and 5-year overall rates were 60% (95% CI, 54-66) and 46% (95% CI, 38-54), respectively. The pooled rates of grade 3 hepatic toxicity, classic radiationinduced liver disease (RILD), and non-classic RILD were 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively.
Conclusions The current study supports PBT for HCC and demonstrates favorable long-term survival and low hepatic toxicities compared with other published studies on other radiotherapy modalities. However, further studies are needed to identify the subgroups that will benefit from PBT.
Backgrounds/Aims Atezolizumab/bevacizumab is the recommended first-line systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and may facilitate curative conversion through resection and locoregional therapies. However, there have been very few reports on curative conversion using microwave ablation (MWA). This study aimed to determine the curative conversion rate with MWA using atezolizumab-bevacizumab as the first-line treatment in patients with uHCC, and to compare the characteristics and survival of patients with and without curative conversion.
Methods Consecutive patients with uHCC who were started on atezolizumab-bevacizumab from May 2021 to December 2023 in a single tertiary center were included. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were based on the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria.
Results Twenty consecutive patients with uHCC (60% advanced-stage) were included, 90% exceeding the up-to-7 criteria. The ORR and DCR were 35% and 60%, 35% and 55% using RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. Five patients (25%) underwent successful curative conversion with MWA (four advanced and one intermediate stage) despite a median HCC size of 6.1 cm (range, 2.4-7.3). Two of these patients were tumor and drug-free 132-133 weeks from the 1st atezolizumab-bevacizumab dose. Patients who underwent curative conversion had significantly longer survival than those who did not (P=0.024). Other factors associated with survival were male sex, Child-Pugh class A, and an objective response.
Conclusions Despite the relatively large tumor size, successful curative conversion with MWA was achieved with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab in uHCC. However, data from prospective multicenter trials are required to determine whether this strategy is universally applicable.
Backgrounds/Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is generally diagnosed at an advanced stage, which limits curative treatment options for these patients. Locoregional therapy (LRT) is the standard approach to bridge and downstage unresectable HCC for liver transplantation (LT). Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev) can induce objective responses in nearly one-third of patients; however, the role and outcomes of downstaging using atezo-bev remains unknown.
Methods In this retrospective single-center study, we included consecutive patients between November 2020 and August 2023, who received atezo-bev with or without LRT and were subsequently considered for resection/LT after downstaging.
Results Of the 115 patients who received atezo-bev, 12 patients (10.4%) achieved complete or partial response and were willing to undergo LT; they (age, 58.5 years; women, 17%; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage system B/C, 5/7) had received 3-12 cycles of atezo- bev, and four of them had received prior LRT. Three patients died before LT, while three were awaiting LT. Six patients underwent curative therapies: four underwent living donor LT after a median of 79.5 days (range, 54-114) following the last atezo-bev dose, one underwent deceased donor LT 38 days after the last dose, and one underwent resection. All but one patient had complete pathologic response with no viable HCC. Three patients experienced wound healing complications, and one required re-exploration and succumbed to sepsis. After a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 4-30), none of the alive patients developed HCC recurrence or graft rejection.
Conclusions Surgical therapy, including LT, is possible after atezo-bev therapy in well-selected patients after downstaging.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Immunotherapy Prior to a Liver Transplant: Literature Review and a Case Report of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With BRCA1 Mutation N. E. Kostrygin, D. S. Chumachenko Innovative Medicine of Kuban.2024; (3): 61. CrossRef
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Pranav Kumar, Chase J. Wehrle, Keyue Sun, Chunbao Jiao, Rebecca Panconesi, Mingyi Zhang, Noah X. Tocci, Hanna Hong, Abby Gross, Erlind Allkushi, Maureen Whitsett Linganna, Andrea Schlegel, Toms Augustin, Charles Miller, David CH Kwon, Kazunari Sasaki, Fed Surgical Oncology Insight.2024; 1(4): 100100. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of combined PD-L1 expression in malignant and infiltrating cells in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab Jaejun Lee, Jae-Sung Yoo, Ji Hoon Kim, Dong Yeup Lee, Keungmo Yang, Bohyun Kim, Joon-Il Choi, Jeong Won Jang, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Ji Won Han, Pil Soo Sung Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
This review examines the transformative role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), spotlighting the progression from traditional EBRT techniques to advanced modalities like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), and innovative particle therapy, including proton beam therapy and carbon ion RT. These advancements have significantly improved the precision and efficacy of RT, marking a paradigm shift in the multimodal management of HCC, particularly in addressing complex cases and enhancing local tumor control. The review underscores the synergistic potential of integrating RT with other treatments like transarterial chemoembolization, systemic therapies such as sorafenib, and emerging immunotherapies, illustrating enhanced survival and disease control outcomes. The efficacy of RT is addressed for challenging conditions, including advanced HCC with macrovascular invasion, and RT modalities, like SBRT, are compared against traditional treatments like radiofrequency ablation for early-stage HCC. Additionally, the review accentuates the encouraging outcomes of particle therapy in enhancing local control and survival rates, minimizing treatment-related toxicity, and advocating for continued research and clinical trials. In conclusion, the integration of RT into multimodal HCC treatment strategies, coupled with the emergence of particle therapy, is crucial for advancing oncologic management, emphasizing the need for relentless innovation and personalized treatment approaches.
Background/Aim Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor thrombi located in the first branch of the portal vein (Vp3) or in the main portal trunk (Vp4) are associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors for HCC recurrence and mortality following liver resection (LR) in patients with Vp3 or Vp4 HCC.
Methods The study included 64 patients who underwent LR for HCC with Vp3 or Vp4 portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).
Results Fifty-eight patients (90.6%) had Vp3 PVTT, whereas the remaining six patients exhibited Vp4 PVTT. The median tumor size measured 8 cm, with approximately 36% of patients presented with multiple tumors. Fifty-four patients (84.4%) underwent open LR, whereas 10 patients underwent laparoscopic LR. In the Vp4 cases, combined LR and tumor thrombectomy were performed. The 3-year cumulative disease-free survival rate was 42.8% for the Vp3 group and 22.2% for the Vp4 group. The overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years was 47.9% for the Vp3 group and 60.0% for the Vp4 group. Intrahepatic metastasis has been identified as an important contributor to HCC recurrence. High hemoglobin levels are associated with high mortality.
Conclusion LR is a safe and effective treatment modality for selected patients with Vp3 or Vp4 HCC PVTT. This suggests that LR is a viable option for these patients, with favorable outcomes in terms of OS.
Jeayeon Park, Yun Bin Lee, Yunmi Ko, Youngsu Park, Hyunjae Shin, Moon Haeng Hur, Min Kyung Park, Dae-Won Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Kyung-Hun Lee, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Tae-Yong Kim, Yoon Jun Kim, Tae-You Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon
J Liver Cancer. 2024;24(1):81-91. Published online January 19, 2024
Background/Aim Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib are currently available as first-line therapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, comparative efficacy studies are still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of these treatments in HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).
Methods We retrospectively included patients who received either atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line systemic therapy for HCC with PVTT. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progressionfree survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR) determined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1.
Results A total of 52 patients were included: 30 received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 22 received lenvatinib. The median follow-up duration was 6.4 months (interquartile range, 3.9-9.8). The median OS was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7 to not estimated) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.8 to not estimated) with lenvatinib (P=0.26 by log-rank test). There was no statistically significant difference in OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.49; P=0.37). The median PFS was similar (P=0.63 by log-rank test), with 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.3-7.7) for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.8) for lenvatinib (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.51-1.69; P=0.80). HRs were similar after inverse probability treatment weighting. The DCRs were 23.3% and 18.2% in patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib, respectively (P=0.74).
Conclusion The effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib was comparable for the treatment of HCC with PVTT.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: Is it the end? Walaa Abdelhamed, Hend Shousha, Mohamed El-Kassas Liver Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Reappraisal of transarterial radioembolization for liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Editorial on “Transarterial radioembolization versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein throm Jin Hyoung Kim, Gun Ha Kim, Dong Il Gwon Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2024; 30(4): 659. CrossRef
Current perspectives on the pharmacological treatment of advanced
hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review Hye-Jin Yoo, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in cancer treatment. However, the risks associated with the treatment must be carefully balanced against the therapeutic benefits. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are generally unpredictable and may persist over an extended period. In this review, we analyzed common irAEs reported in highly cited original articles and systematic reviews. The prevalent adverse reactions include fatigue, pyrexia, rash, pruritus, diarrhea, decreased appetite, nausea, abdominal pain, constipation, hepatitis, and hypothyroidism. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct evaluations not only of gastrointestinal organs but also of cardiac, neurologic, endocrine (including the frequently affected thyroid), and ophthalmic systems before commencing ICIs. This review further explores commonly reported types of irAEs, specific irAEs associated with each ICI agent, rare yet potentially fatal irAEs, and available treatment options for managing them.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
METTL3-mediated SMPDL3A promotes cell growth, metastasis and immune process of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating LRPPRC Weixin Xu, Miaomiao Tao, Yeqiong Liu, Jun Yan, Jiali Hu, Lei Wang Cellular Signalling.2025; 127: 111543. CrossRef
Intrahepatic IgA complex induces polarization of cancer-associated fibroblasts to matrix phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment of HCC Jong Geun Park, Pu Reun Roh, Min Woo Kang, Sung Woo Cho, Suhyun Hwangbo, Hae Deok Jung, Hyun Uk Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Jae-Sung Yoo, Ji Won Han, Jeong Won Jang, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Young Kyoung You, Ho Joong Choi, Jae Yong Ryu, Pil Soo Sung Hepatology.2024; 80(5): 1074. CrossRef
Risk of Bleeding in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Young-Gi Song, Kyeong-Min Yeom, Eun Ae Jung, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo Liver Cancer.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: past, present, and future Rushabh Gujarathi, Joseph W. Franses, Anjana Pillai, Chih-Yi Liao Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Atezolizumab-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review Hyuk Kim, Yoon E Shin, Hye-Jin Yoo, Jae-Young Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim Medicina.2024; 60(9): 1422. CrossRef
A Potential Pneumothorax Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report and Literature Review Yoon-E Shin, Hyuk Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim Medicina.2024; 60(10): 1634. CrossRef
The histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of hepatocellular
carcinoma: a narrative review Wonju Chung, Haeryoung Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Pathogenesis and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated
steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative
review Han Ah Lee The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Current perspectives on the pharmacological treatment of advanced
hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review Hye-Jin Yoo, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly aggressive disease that is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Advanced HCC has limited treatment options and often has a poor prognosis. For the past decade, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been the only treatments approved for advanced HCC that have shown overall survival (OS) benefits; however, but their clinical efficacy has been limited. Recent trials have demonstrated promising advancements in survival outcomes through immunotherapy-based treatments, such as combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with other ICIs, antiangiogenic drugs, and locoregional therapies. The atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab (STRIDE) regimen has significantly improved survival rates as a first-line treatment and has become the new standard of care. Therefore, combined treatments for advanced HCC can result in better treatment outcomes owing to their synergistic effects, which requires a multidisciplinary approach. Ongoing studies are examining other therapeutic innovations that can improve disease control and OS rates. Despite improvements in the treatment of advanced HCC, further studies on the optimal treatment selection and sequences, biomarker identification, combination approaches with other therapies, and development of novel immunotherapy agents are required. This review presents the current treatment options and clinical data of the ICI-based combination immunotherapies for advanced HCC from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Reduced-Dose or Discontinuation of Bevacizumab Might Be Considered after Variceal Bleeding in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab: Case Reports Kyeong-Min Yeom, Young-Gi Song, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim Medicina.2024; 60(1): 157. CrossRef
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Advances in Systemic Therapy Insija Ilyas Selene, Merve Ozen, Reema A. Patel Seminars in Interventional Radiology.2024; 41(01): 056. CrossRef
Fatal intratumoral hemorrhage in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma following successful treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab: A case report Kyeong-Hoon Park, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim World Journal of Clinical Cases.2024; 12(22): 5177. CrossRef
Unravelling infiltrating T‐cell heterogeneity in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma: Integrative single‐cell and spatial transcriptomic profiling Haiqing Chen, Haoyuan Zuo, Jinbang Huang, Jie Liu, Lai Jiang, Chenglu Jiang, Shengke Zhang, Qingwen Hu, Haotian Lai, Bangchao Yin, Guanhu Yang, Gang Mai, Bo Li, Hao Chi Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Atezolizumab-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review Hyuk Kim, Yoon E Shin, Hye-Jin Yoo, Jae-Young Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim Medicina.2024; 60(9): 1422. CrossRef
A Potential Pneumothorax Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report and Literature Review Yoon-E Shin, Hyuk Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim Medicina.2024; 60(10): 1634. CrossRef
Prediction of PD-L1 expression in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI Jun Gu Kang, Kyunghwa Han, Taek Chung, Hyungjin Rhee European Journal of Radiology.2024; 181: 111772. CrossRef
Advances in Understanding Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vasculature: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment Hyungjin Rhee, Young Nyun Park, Jin-Young Choi Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(10): 887. CrossRef
Current perspectives on the pharmacological treatment of advanced
hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review Hye-Jin Yoo, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young Seok Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Improved survival with second-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab failure in hepatocellular carcinoma Ji Yeon Lee, Jaejun Lee, Suho Kim, Jae-sung Yoo, Ji Hoon Kim, Keungmo Yang, Ji Won Han, Jeong Won Jang, Jong Yong Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Ho Jong Chun, Jung Suk Oh, Pil Soo Sung Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Han Ah Lee, Sangheun Lee, Hae Lim Lee, Jeong Eun Song, Dong Hyeon Lee, Sojung Han, Ju Hyun Shim, Bo Hyun Kim, Jong Young Choi, Hyunchul Rhim, Do Young Kim
J Liver Cancer. 2023;23(2):362-376. Published online September 14, 2023
Background/Aim Despite the increasing proportion of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over time, treatment efficacy in this population is not well established.
Methods Data collected from the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry, a representative cohort of patients newly diagnosed with HCC in Korea between 2008 and 2017, were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) according to tumor stage and treatment modality was compared between elderly and non-elderly patients with HCC.
Results Among 15,186 study patients, 5,829 (38.4%) were elderly. A larger proportion of elderly patients did not receive any treatment for HCC than non-elderly patients (25.2% vs. 16.7%). However, OS was significantly better in elderly patients who received treatment compared to those who did not (median, 38.6 vs. 22.3 months; P<0.001). In early-stage HCC, surgery yielded significantly lower OS in elderly patients compared to non-elderly patients (median, 97.4 vs. 138.0 months; P<0.001), however, local ablation (median, 82.2 vs. 105.5 months) and transarterial therapy (median, 42.6 vs. 56.9 months) each provided comparable OS between the two groups after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis (all P>0.05). After IPTW, in intermediate-stage HCC, surgery (median, 66.0 vs. 90.3 months) and transarterial therapy (median, 36.5 vs. 37.2 months), and in advanced-stage HCC, transarterial (median, 25.3 vs. 26.3 months) and systemic therapy (median, 25.3 vs. 26.3 months) yielded comparable OS between the elderly and non-elderly HCC patients (all P>0.05).
Conclusions Personalized treatments tailored to individual patients can improve the prognosis of elderly patients with HCC to a level comparable to that of non-elderly patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Resection in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jin-Soo Lee, Dong Ah Park, Seungeun Ryoo, Jungeun Park, Gi Hong Choi, Jeong-Ju Yoo Gut and Liver.2024; 18(4): 695. CrossRef
Achieving Sufficient Therapeutic Outcomes of Surgery in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients through Appropriate Selection Han Ah Lee Gut and Liver.2024; 18(4): 556. CrossRef
Background/Aim Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether additional RT is safe and effective in patients with advanced HCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of additional RT in these patients.
Methods Between March and October 2021, we retrospectively analyzed seven patients with advanced HCC who received RT during treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The median prescribed RT dose was 35 Gy (range, 33–66). Freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after RT were analyzed.
Results The median follow-up duration after RT was 14.2 months (range, 10.0–18.6). Of the seven patients, disease progression was noted in six (85.7%), the sites of disease progression were local in two (28.6%), intrahepatic in four (57.1%), and extrahepatic in four (57.1%). The median time of FFLP was not reached, and PFS and OS times were 4.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6–4.5) and 14.8% (95% CI, 12.5–17.2) months, respectively. The 1-year FFLP, PFS, and OS rates were 60% (95% CI, 43.8–76.2), 0%, and 85.7% (95% CI, 75.9–95.5), respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events (AEs) were not observed, but grade 3 nonhematologic AEs unrelated to RT were observed in one patient.
Conclusions The addition of RT may be feasible in patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Letter regarding “Feasibility of additional radiotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab” Sun Hyun Bae, Hee Chul Park Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(2): 402. CrossRef