Surgical resection for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provides the potential for long-term survival but recurrence rates within 5 years were up to 70%. Thus, neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategies can be important to improve outcomes. Previous efforts with sorafenib in the adjuvant setting failed to show significant benefits in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival. However, developments in systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine kinase inhibitors have revitalized this field. Although the IMBrave050 trial failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in RFS with one year of adjuvant treatment using atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab in high-risk patients treated with resection or ablation, several other ongoing trials are investigating this promising approach. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant approach using systemic therapies is also gaining attention, supported by phase 1 or 2 clinical trials indicating high objective response rates. In addition, systemic therapies are being increasingly studied as down-staging strategies for resection or liver transplantation. The growing complexity of HCC treatment such as the integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to optimize therapeutic decision-making in this evolving areas.
With the advances in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, the lung metastasis of HCC is becoming increasingly important. In treating the lung metastasis of HCC, a multidisciplinary approach can lead to better results than systemic chemotherapy alone. Here, we report on a patient who presented with pulmonary masses, while the HCC was being controlled in the abdominal cavity. The presence of nontuberculous mycobacteria was identified during the diagnosis of the pulmonary masses. The pulmonary metastases of HCC were treated with a combination of angiotherapy, radiation therapy, and radiofrequency ablation. The patient showed a satisfactory progress with this multidisciplinary localized treatment. We report the clinical progress and review the recent literature regarding the treatment of pulmonary metastasis without intrahepatic HCC herein.
Conventional chemoembolization using Lipiodol-based regimens was introduced in the 1980s, and it is currently recommended as the primary treatment modality for patients with unresectable, intermediate, or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by the international guidelines. For better therapeutic efficacy and safety, chemoembolization should be performed as selectively as possible through tumor-feeding arteries, based on the detection of arterial supply to the HCC. With the technical advancement of flat-panel detector, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is mounted on the C-arm of the angiographic machine. CBCT facilitates the detection of small occult HCCs and fine tumor-feeding arteries, recognition of extrahepatic collateral supply, navigation of a microcatheter to the target feeding arteries, prevention of non-target embolization, and intraprocedural assessment of the completeness of treatment with chemoembolization. These functions performed by CBCT ultimately improve the safety and efficacy of chemoembolization and may contribute to improving the prognosis of the patient with HCC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Model Predicting Survival in Intermediate-Stage HCC Patients Reclassified for TACE Based on the 2022 BCLC Criteria Jihoon Kim, Jin-Hyoung Kim, Eunbyul Ko, Jeong-Yeon Kim, Byung Soo Im, Gun Ha Kim, Hee Ho Chu, Heung-Kyu Ko, Dong Il Gwon, Ji Hoon Shin, Ibrahim Alrashidi Cancers.2025; 17(5): 894. CrossRef
Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography and guidance software in transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma Shiro Miyayama EngMedicine.2025; 2(2): 100075. CrossRef
Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Expert Consensus-Based Practical Recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association Yuri Cho, Jin Woo Choi, Hoon Kwon, Kun Yung Kim, Byung Chan Lee, Hee Ho Chu, Dong Hyeon Lee, Han Ah Lee, Gyoung Min Kim, Jung Suk Oh, Dongho Hyun, In Joon Lee, Hyunchul Rhim Korean Journal of Radiology.2023; 24(7): 606. CrossRef
Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2023 expert consensus-based practical recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association Yuri Cho, Jin Woo Choi, Hoon Kwon, Kun Yung Kim, Byung Chan Lee, Hee Ho Chu, Dong Hyeon Lee, Han Ah Lee, Gyoung Min Kim, Jung Suk Oh, Dongho Hyun, In Joon Lee, Hyunchul Rhim Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(2): 241. CrossRef
Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2023 Expert consensus-based practical recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association Yuri Cho, Jin Woo Choi, Hoon Kwon, Kun Yung Kim, Byung Chan Lee, Hee Ho Chu, Dong Hyeon Lee, Han Ah Lee, Gyoung Min Kim, Jung Suk Oh, Dongho Hyun, In Joon Lee, Hyunchul Rhim Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2023; 29(3): 521. CrossRef
The efficacy of TACE; how can automated feeder software help? Hassan Abdelsalam, Doaa M. Emara, Ehab M. Hassouna Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most prevalent malignancies and frequent causes of death worldwide. Treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma consist of locoregional therapy, surgical resection, liver transplantation, and systemic therapy. Assessment of tumor response is required in patients receiving locoregional and systemic therapy. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is widely used tumor response evaluation criteria. However, the RECIST does not reflect the extent of tumor necrosis after some locoregional therapies and molecular targeted agents. The Modified RECIST (mRECIST), which has the concept of viable tumor, was introduced in order to overcome this problem. The mRECIST were developed on the basis of RECIST version 1.1 and only tumoral tissue showing contrast uptake in arterial phase of dynamic radiologic imaging techniques was measured to assess tumor response. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. To identify tumor response after immunotherapy, immune RECIST (iRECIST) has been proposed as consensusbased criteria. After achieving complete response after curative treatment, optimal surveillance was needed to detect recurrence. Individualized surveillance schedule should be considered, taking into consideration the risk factors of the patient and the risk associated with the treatment modalities.
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the third leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide.
Only 30% of patients are eligible for curative surgical resection at diagnosis. For patients with
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with accompanying portal vein tumor thrombosis, Sorafenib
is recommended as first-line treatment. However, survival gain from sorafenib is unsatisfactory,
and there is no standard therapy for patients who are intolerable or refractory to sorafenib. Here
we report a case of a 52-year-old man who initially achieved partial response after sorafenib
treatment, but eventually showed disease progression and was treated subsequently with
transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Multinodular recurrence occurred, but he was treated
with repeated TACE, and has survived for 4 years so far.