Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JLC : Journal of Liver Cancer

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Multidetector computed tomography"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Publication year
Review Article
Radiologic features of hepatocellular carcinoma related to prognosis
Shin Hye Hwang, Hyungjin Rhee
J Liver Cancer. 2023;23(1):143-156.   Published online March 9, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2023.02.16
  • 4,180 Views
  • 180 Downloads
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The cross-sectional imaging findings play a crucial role in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies have shown that imaging findings of HCC are not only relevant for the diagnosis of HCC, but also for identifying genetic and pathologic characteristics and determining prognosis. Imaging findings such as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, arterial phase peritumoral hyperenhancement, hepatobiliary phase peritumoral hypointensity, non-smooth tumor margin, low apparent diffusion coefficient, and the LR-M category of the Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System have been reported to be associated with poor prognosis. In contrast, imaging findings such as enhancing capsule appearance, hepatobiliary phase hyperintensity, and fat in mass have been reported to be associated with a favorable prognosis. Most of these imaging findings were examined in retrospective, single-center studies that were not adequately validated. However, the imaging findings can be applied for deciding the treatment strategy for HCC, if their significance can be confirmed by a large multicenter study. In this literature, we would like to review imaging findings related to the prognosis of HCC as well as their associated clinicopathological characteristics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Nomogram Based on MRI Visual Decision Tree to Evaluate Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hanting Dai, Chuan Yan, Wanrong Huang, Yifan Pan, Feng Pan, Yamei Liu, Shunli Wang, Huifang Wang, Rongping Ye, Yueming Li
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2025; 61(2): 970.     CrossRef
  • Prediction early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and IVIM
    Da Guo, Liping Liu, Yu Jin
    European Journal of Radiology Open.2025; 14: 100643.     CrossRef
  • Radiomics and machine learning based on preoperative MRI for predicting extrahepatic metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization
    Gang Peng, Xiaojing Cao, Xiaoyu Huang, Xiang Zhou
    European Journal of Radiology Open.2024; 12: 100551.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Parameters Work Well as Predictive Factors for Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Ji Yeon Lee, Pil Soo Sung
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(4): 558.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Understanding Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vasculature: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment
    Hyungjin Rhee, Young Nyun Park, Jin-Young Choi
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(10): 887.     CrossRef
  • Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong Hwan Kim, Sang Hyun Choi
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2024; 24(2): 192.     CrossRef
  • Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver
    Mingyue Song, Yuhao Tao, Hanjun Zhang, Mingzhan Du, Lingchuan Guo, Chunhong Hu, Weiguo Zhang
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 114: 110241.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of PD-L1 expression in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Jun Gu Kang, Kyunghwa Han, Taek Chung, Hyungjin Rhee
    European Journal of Radiology.2024; 181: 111772.     CrossRef
  • The histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review
    Wonju Chung, Haeryoung Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Can Predict Immune-Excluded Phenotype of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Eisuke Ueshima, Keitaro Sofue, Takahiro Kodama, Shuhei Yamamoto, Masato Komatsu, Shohei Komatsu, Nobuaki Ishihara, Akihiro Umeno, Takeru Yamaguchi, Masatoshi Hori, Takumi Fukumoto, Tetsuo Takehara, Takamichi Murakami
    Liver Cancer.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Imaging prognostication and tumor biology in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Diana Kadi, Marilyn F. Yamamoto, Emily C. Lerner, Hanyu Jiang, Kathryn J. Fowler, Mustafa R. Bashir
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(2): 284.     CrossRef
Close layer
Original Article
Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Discrepant Features on Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Young Youn Cho, Jung Hee Kwon, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jeong Min Lee, Jae Young Lee, Hyo-Choel Kim, Jin Wook Chung, Won-mook Choi, Eun Ju Cho, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Chung Yong Kim, Hyo-Suk Lee
J Liver Cancer. 2015;15(1):19-29.   Published online March 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.15.1.19
  • 1,711 Views
  • 11 Downloads
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background/Aims
This study compared the outcomes of patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) who were treated using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
Methods
This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective study that evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). We analyzed 41 small hepatic nodules in 32 patients that showed typical radiologic hallmarks on both CT and gadoxate-enhanced MRI (typical nodules) and 25 small hepatic nodules from 22 patients that showed atypical radiologic hallmarks on CT and typical radiologic hallmarks on MRI (discrepant nodules).
Results
There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients with typical and discrepant nodules. Complete response rates 1 month after TACE or RFA were 75.0% (18/24) and 94.1% (16/17; P=0.20), respectively, for the patients with typical nodules and 58.8% (10/17) and 100% (8/8; P=0.05), respectively, for the patients with discrepant nodules. Treatment failure rates after TACE or RFA were 33.3% (8/24) and 5.8% (1/17; P=0.15), respectively, for the patients with typical nodules and 47.0% (8/17) and 0.0% (0/8; P=0.02), respectively, for the patients with discrepant nodules. Among patients achieving complete response, there were no significant differences in the risk of marginal recurrence.
Conclusions
RFA provided higher complete response rates and significantly lower treatment failure rates than TACE for patients with discrepant nodules of HCC. Therefore, a treatment modality such as RFA may be preferable for small HCCs which show discrepancy on two imaging modalities.
Close layer

JLC : Journal of Liver Cancer
TOP