The cross-sectional imaging findings play a crucial role in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies have shown that imaging findings of HCC are not only relevant for the diagnosis of HCC, but also for identifying genetic and pathologic characteristics and determining prognosis. Imaging findings such as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, arterial phase peritumoral hyperenhancement, hepatobiliary phase peritumoral hypointensity, non-smooth tumor margin, low apparent diffusion coefficient, and the LR-M category of the Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System have been reported to be associated with poor prognosis. In contrast, imaging findings such as enhancing capsule appearance, hepatobiliary phase hyperintensity, and fat in mass have been reported to be associated with a favorable prognosis. Most of these imaging findings were examined in retrospective, single-center studies that were not adequately validated. However, the imaging findings can be applied for deciding the treatment strategy for HCC, if their significance can be confirmed by a large multicenter study. In this literature, we would like to review imaging findings related to the prognosis of HCC as well as their associated clinicopathological characteristics.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Nomogram Based on MRI Visual Decision Tree to Evaluate Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hanting Dai, Chuan Yan, Wanrong Huang, Yifan Pan, Feng Pan, Yamei Liu, Shunli Wang, Huifang Wang, Rongping Ye, Yueming Li Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2025; 61(2): 970. CrossRef
Prediction early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and IVIM Da Guo, Liping Liu, Yu Jin European Journal of Radiology Open.2025; 14: 100643. CrossRef
Radiomics and machine learning based on preoperative MRI for predicting extrahepatic metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization Gang Peng, Xiaojing Cao, Xiaoyu Huang, Xiang Zhou European Journal of Radiology Open.2024; 12: 100551. CrossRef
Clinical Parameters Work Well as Predictive Factors for Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ji Yeon Lee, Pil Soo Sung Gut and Liver.2024; 18(4): 558. CrossRef
Advances in Understanding Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vasculature: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment Hyungjin Rhee, Young Nyun Park, Jin-Young Choi Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(10): 887. CrossRef
Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dong Hwan Kim, Sang Hyun Choi Journal of Liver Cancer.2024; 24(2): 192. CrossRef
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver Mingyue Song, Yuhao Tao, Hanjun Zhang, Mingzhan Du, Lingchuan Guo, Chunhong Hu, Weiguo Zhang Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 114: 110241. CrossRef
Prediction of PD-L1 expression in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI Jun Gu Kang, Kyunghwa Han, Taek Chung, Hyungjin Rhee European Journal of Radiology.2024; 181: 111772. CrossRef
The histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of hepatocellular
carcinoma: a narrative review Wonju Chung, Haeryoung Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Can Predict Immune-Excluded Phenotype of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Eisuke Ueshima, Keitaro Sofue, Takahiro Kodama, Shuhei Yamamoto, Masato Komatsu, Shohei Komatsu, Nobuaki Ishihara, Akihiro Umeno, Takeru Yamaguchi, Masatoshi Hori, Takumi Fukumoto, Tetsuo Takehara, Takamichi Murakami Liver Cancer.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Imaging prognostication and tumor biology in hepatocellular carcinoma Diana Kadi, Marilyn F. Yamamoto, Emily C. Lerner, Hanyu Jiang, Kathryn J. Fowler, Mustafa R. Bashir Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(2): 284. CrossRef
Young Youn Cho, Jung Hee Kwon, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jeong Min Lee, Jae Young Lee, Hyo-Choel Kim, Jin Wook Chung, Won-mook Choi, Eun Ju Cho, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Chung Yong Kim, Hyo-Suk Lee
J Liver Cancer. 2015;15(1):19-29. Published online March 31, 2015
Background/Aims This study compared the outcomes of patients with small hepatocellular
carcinomas (HCCs) who were treated using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or
radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective study that evaluated the diagnostic
efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). We analyzed
41 small hepatic nodules in 32 patients that showed typical radiologic hallmarks on both CT
and gadoxate-enhanced MRI (typical nodules) and 25 small hepatic nodules from 22 patients
that showed atypical radiologic hallmarks on CT and typical radiologic hallmarks on MRI
(discrepant nodules). Results There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients
with typical and discrepant nodules. Complete response rates 1 month after TACE or RFA were
75.0% (18/24) and 94.1% (16/17; P=0.20), respectively, for the patients with typical nodules
and 58.8% (10/17) and 100% (8/8; P=0.05), respectively, for the patients with discrepant
nodules. Treatment failure rates after TACE or RFA were 33.3% (8/24) and 5.8% (1/17; P=0.15),
respectively, for the patients with typical nodules and 47.0% (8/17) and 0.0% (0/8; P=0.02),
respectively, for the patients with discrepant nodules. Among patients achieving complete
response, there were no significant differences in the risk of marginal recurrence. Conclusions RFA provided higher complete response rates and significantly lower treatment failure rates than TACE for patients with discrepant nodules of HCC. Therefore, a treatment
modality such as RFA may be preferable for small HCCs which show discrepancy on two
imaging modalities.