Search
- Page Path
-
HOME
> Search
Review Articles
- Treatment Response Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
-
Joon-Il Choi
-
Journal of the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group. 2012;12(1):16-22. Published online February 28, 2012
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- The most important and primary endpoint in oncology research is overall survival. However, other endpoints such as
time-to-progression, time-to-recurrence and response rate have their roles in oncology trials and these endpoints are assessed by
the imaging evaluation of tumor burden. Recently published the revised version (version 1.1) of response evaluation criteria in
solid tumors (RECIST) is now the standards for the tumor response evaluation after treatment, and especially for cytotoxic
agents. However, the problems are more complicated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RECIST are mainly used for the
response evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. However, for the treatment of HCC, there are some locoregional treatments and
molecular targeted agents, and after these treatments, tumor necrosis remains as non-enhanced tumor areas, whereas viable tumor
parts can be noted by the enhanced areas. However, these necrotic areas should be included as being tumor when we adopt the
pure anatomical criteria such as RECIST and this can distort the results of the response evaluation. For overcoming this problem,
some new criteria were introduced and their principle is the measurement of enhancing portion of the tumor only. However, these
new criteria still have limitations and functional imaging is thought to be the future problem-solving tool for the evaluation of
response for molecular targeted agents.
- Response Evaluation Assessment in HCC: Modified RECIST
-
So Yeon Kim
-
Journal of the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group. 2011;11(2):111-115. Published online September 30, 2011
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- The accurate evaluation of response to treatment is a key aspect in cancer therapy, because an objective response may become
a surrogate marker of improver survival. For cytotoxic drugs, tumor response evaluation according to the World Health
Organization (WHO) criteria or the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline offers simple approaches
based on the size of the lesions. However, considering the nature of locoregional therapy or new cytostatic agent for
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which do not decrease the size of the tumor but induce tumor necrosis, original WHO or
RECIST criteria will not reflect clinical benefit exactly. Recently, modified RECIST assessment is proposed by AASLD-JNCI
guidelines. Given that complete necrosis was well correlated with better survival, modified RECIST criteria consider changes in
tumor viability, which can be measured as the area of arterial enhancement, with maintaining overall response assessment similar
to RECIST. The proposed modified RECIST assessment is expected to provide a reliable method for assessing tumor response in
HCC clinical trials.
TOP