Background/Aims Because hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication has been known to play an
important role in cancer recurrence after curative treatment of HBV-related hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC), we examined whether treatment based on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs)
might decrease the recurrence rate and improve patient survival.
Methods The retrospective cohort study enrolled 73 patients with chronic hepatitis B who
were treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
with curative intent for HCC. Among those, 30 and 43 patients were treated with tenofovir
disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV), respectively.
Results Of the 73 patients, 51 experienced HCC recurrence, and 14 patients were dead
during a follow-up of 73±34 months. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor size (hazard
ratio [HR], 1.590; 95% confidence-interval [CI], 1.106-2.285; P=0.012) and Child-Pugh class B
(vs. class A/non cirrhosis; HR, 5.794; 95% CI, 2.311-14.523; P=0.001) was significantly associated
with HCC recurrence, and Child-Pugh class B (HR, 7.357; 95% CI, 2.100-25.777; P=0.002) was an
independent unfavorable prognostic factor for survival. During NAs therapy, TDF was superior
to ETV for complete viral response at 1 year after the date of combination of TACE and RFA
(P=0.016). However, the risks of HCC recurrence and survival were not significantly different
between those treated with TDF versus ETV.
Conclusions TDF was superior to ETV for achieving complete viral response. However, the
recurrence and mortality after TACE and RFA for HBV-related HCC were not significantly
different between patients treated with TDF versus ETV.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhanced prognosis of HCC patients undergoing radical treatments with tenofovir versus entecavir: A meta-analysis based on propensity score matching studies Qingyan Kong, Mengshi Yi, Fei Teng, Zheyu Chen Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(1): 55. CrossRef
Tenofovir versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hui Liu, Cheng-Long Han, Bao-Wen Tian, Zi-Niu Ding, Ya-Fei Yang, Yun-Long Ma, Chun-Cheng Yang, Guang-Xiao Meng, Jun-Shuai Xue, Dong-Xu Wang, Zhao-Ru Dong, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Jian-Guo Hong, Tao Li Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 17(6): 623. CrossRef
A nationwide study on the current treatment status and natural prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly Jeong-Ju Yoo, Jayoun Lee, Gi Hong Choi, Min Woo Lee, Dong Ah Park Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Background/Aims Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) help reduce the recurrence rate after
the curative treatment of hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib has
been shown to improve survival of advanced HCC patients. Whether antiviral therapy with
NAs could help such patients is unknown. Our aim is to investigate the usefulness of antiviral
therapy for advanced-stage HCC treated with sorafenib.
Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in advanced-stage HCC patients
treated with sorafenib between June 2007 and December 2013. Patients in group A (the nonantiviral
therapy group) were treated with sorafenib alone. Those in group B (the antiviral
therapy group) were treated with sorafenib and NAs. Progression-free survival (PS) and overall
survival (OS) were compared between these two groups.
Results Finally, 23 patients in group A and 40 patients in group B were enrolled in the study.
The mean number of days of treatment with sorafenib was 79 (34-231) days and 96 (33-449)
days for group A and B, respectively (P=0.286). The mean PS of group A and B was 97 (14-449)
days and 51 (0-461) days, respectively (P=0.068). The OS was 154 (44-741) days in group A and
138 (30-1,025) days in group B (P=0.665). PS and OS showed no significant difference between
the two groups.
Conclusions This study shows that there was no significant survival gain of using antiviral
therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC treated with sorafenib. In consideration of costeffectiveness,
antiviral therapy may be not mandatory. (J Liver Cancer 2016;16:23-30)
A 54-year-old female patient with no medical history visited our hospital complaining of both
pretibial pitting oedema for 6 months, and abdominal distension for 1 month. Computed
tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an 2.3cm sized tumour at segment
2 of the liver. Her Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class was C (score 11) at the initial visit. She was
diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (UICC stage II, BCLC stage D), and then she underwent
conservative treatment for 1 month. After one month of conservative treatment, her liver
function was improved to CTP class B (score 8), and then she underwent combination
treatment of transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation. However, her
liver function was deteriorated gradually. She was transferred to other hospital for liver
transplantation eventually. (J Liver Cancer 2014;14:131-134)
Surgical resection has been considered to be the best treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
However, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been reported to be more effective than other local ablation
treatments and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in achieving complete tumor necrosis. Recently, combined
chemoembolization and RFA may improve both overall and recurrence-free survival rates in patients with early
stage HCC. RFA have not been applied in cases of that tumors were non-visualization on ultrasonography, and
located near by large vessels, main bile ducts, and major extra-hepatic organs. we found that tumor, which was
not shown on ultrasonography before TACE, can be visible for several days just after TACE. We report the
clinical course and complete necrosis of tumor in two cases of small HCC by TACE and consecutive RFA within
a few days.