Hae Lim Lee, Su Jong Yu, Sung Hak Lee, Min Woo Lee, Han Ah Lee, Yuri Cho, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Ha Il Kim, Jae Geun Lee, Hye Won Lee, Jihyun An, Sun Young Yim, Pil Soo Sung, Jonggi Choi, Jae Hyun Yoon, Eun Ju Cho, Jinhong Jung, Dongho Hyun, Ijin Joo, Yu Rim Lee, YoungRok Choi, Bo Hyun Kim, Sung Hyun Kim, Soon Sun Kim, Jeong-Han Kim, Haeryoung Kim, Pyoung-Jae Park, Hyun Phil Shin, Ki Tae Yoon, Sang Min Yoon, Minjong Lee, Jai Young Cho, Jin-Young Choi, Do Young Kim, June Sung Lee, Mi-Sook Kim, Kyung Sik Kim
J Liver Cancer. 2026;26(2):205-219. Published online September 3, 2026
The role of liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being re-evaluated in the era of precision oncology and biomarker-driven systemic therapy. Although histopathological examination remains the diagnostic gold standard, HCC is unique among solid tumors in that accurate non-invasive imaging criteria allow diagnosis without routine biopsy in selected clinical settings. However, increasing biological heterogeneity, expanding therapeutic options, and the growing need for molecular stratification have renewed interest in tissue-based evaluation. Recent international guidelines have gradually broadened the indications for liver biopsy, particularly in selected diagnostic scenarios, prior to systemic therapy, and for molecular profiling. Beyond diagnostic confirmation, liver biopsy provides important information for histological subtyping, prognostic stratification, and biomarker discovery. Advances in immunohistochemistry, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence-assisted pathology have further enhanced the clinical value of tumor tissue. In parallel, contemporary cohort studies indicate that liver biopsy is associated with low complication rates when modern techniques and standardized peri-procedural management are applied. Despite these advances, the integration of liver biopsy into routine clinical practice remains limited. To contextualize this gap, the Korean Liver Cancer Association conducted a nationwide survey of HCC specialists. The survey showed that liver biopsy is infrequently performed in current practice due to perceived procedural risks and limited immediate impact on therapeutic decision-making. Taken together, accumulating evidence supports a reappraisal of the clinical role of liver biopsy in HCC. Optimizing procedural safety, standardizing indications, and integrating tissue-based molecular insights into therapeutic decision-making may help bridge the gap between emerging evidence and real-world practice.
Jinhong Jung, Han Ah Lee, Do Young Kim, Hyun-Cheol Kang, Sun Hyun Bae, Ji Hye Min, Gyu Sang Yoo, Jeong Il Yu, Seo Hee Choi, Hae Lim Lee, Subin Heo, Chai Hong Rim, Sang Min Yoon, June Sung Lee
J Liver Cancer. 2026;26(2):182-204. Published online September 2, 2026
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive, high-precision radiation technique that delivers a high dose to the tumor in a limited number of fractions, typically five or fewer, and is increasingly used as a curative-intent option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly when surgical resection, liver transplantation, or local ablative therapies are not feasible. Although domestic and international guidelines have incorporated SBRT into the treatment algorithm for HCC, the lack of comprehensive evidence and expert opinion regarding patient selection, pretreatment evaluation, treatment planning and delivery, complication management, and post-treatment follow-up has resulted in substantial variation in clinical practice. Accordingly, expert consensus-based practical recommendations for SBRT were developed by a group of radiation oncologists, hepatologists, and radiologists from the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association, based on expert surveys, a comprehensive review of evidence-based literature, and a modified Delphi process. Encompassing the entire clinical workflow of liver SBRT, these recommendations are intended to provide practical guidance for the safe and effective implementation of SBRT in patients with HCC.
Han Ah Lee, Sangheun Lee, Hae Lim Lee, Jeong Eun Song, Dong Hyeon Lee, Sojung Han, Ju Hyun Shim, Bo Hyun Kim, Jong Young Choi, Hyunchul Rhim, Do Young Kim
J Liver Cancer. 2023;23(2):362-376. Published online September 14, 2023
Background/Aim Despite the increasing proportion of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over time, treatment efficacy in this population is not well established.
Methods Data collected from the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry, a representative cohort of patients newly diagnosed with HCC in Korea between 2008 and 2017, were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) according to tumor stage and treatment modality was compared between elderly and non-elderly patients with HCC.
Results Among 15,186 study patients, 5,829 (38.4%) were elderly. A larger proportion of elderly patients did not receive any treatment for HCC than non-elderly patients (25.2% vs. 16.7%). However, OS was significantly better in elderly patients who received treatment compared to those who did not (median, 38.6 vs. 22.3 months; P<0.001). In early-stage HCC, surgery yielded significantly lower OS in elderly patients compared to non-elderly patients (median, 97.4 vs. 138.0 months; P<0.001), however, local ablation (median, 82.2 vs. 105.5 months) and transarterial therapy (median, 42.6 vs. 56.9 months) each provided comparable OS between the two groups after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis (all P>0.05). After IPTW, in intermediate-stage HCC, surgery (median, 66.0 vs. 90.3 months) and transarterial therapy (median, 36.5 vs. 37.2 months), and in advanced-stage HCC, transarterial (median, 25.3 vs. 26.3 months) and systemic therapy (median, 25.3 vs. 26.3 months) yielded comparable OS between the elderly and non-elderly HCC patients (all P>0.05).
Conclusions Personalized treatments tailored to individual patients can improve the prognosis of elderly patients with HCC to a level comparable to that of non-elderly patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients – An overview Joseph Dao, Ananya Uddanti, Bryant Morocho, Ponnandai Somasundar, Steve Kwon Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2027; 18(1): 104151. CrossRef
Effect of Direct‐Acting Antivirals on Prognosis in Older Patients With Hepatitis C Virus‐Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Therapy: A Retrospective Study by the Red Cross Liver Study Group in Japan Hironori Ochi, Masayuki Kurosaki, Takaaki Tanaka, Takehiro Akahane, Hiroyuki Marusawa, Haruhiko Kobashi, Hideki Fujii, Atsuhiro Morita, Yasushi Uchida, Kazuhiko Okada, Naohito Urawa, Nami Mori, Keiji Tsuji, Eisuke Okamoto, Chikara Ogawa, Masahiko Kondo, M Hepatology Research.2026; 56(5): 744. CrossRef
An Image-Guided Combination Strategy: Immediate Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Nivolumab Following Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Sujing Zhang, Zheng Zheng, Changwang Zhang, Xueqian Liu, Xinlei Shi, Wenhua Ma Cancers.2026; 18(6): 978. CrossRef
Contemporary Approaches to the Care of Older Adults with Gastrointestinal Cancers Dina Ioffe, Efrat Dotan Advances in Oncology.2026; 6(1): 223. CrossRef
CECT Radiomics and Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting Early Recurrence in Older Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Fang Liu, Zhi Zou, Liuchang Zheng Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2026; Volume 13: 1. CrossRef
Discrepancy Between Eligibility and Practice: A 14-Year Nationwide Study on Curative Resection in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Sun Woong Kim, Jun Sik Yoon, Young Lee, Heejoon Jang Cancers.2026; 18(15): 2457. CrossRef
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly and adolescent/young adult populations Han Ah Lee Journal of Liver Cancer.2025; 25(1): 52. CrossRef
Immunological Landscape and Molecular Therapeutic Targets of the Tumor Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Yusra Zarlashat, Abdul Ghaffar, Flora Guerra, Anna Picca International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(16): 7836. CrossRef
The delayed cancer treatment and economic inequality in Korea: results of common cancers by the time-to-surgery
Noorhee Son, Woo-Ri Lee, Dong-Woo Choi, Kyu-Tae Han Epidemiology and Health.2025; 47: e2025056. CrossRef
Radiotherapy for Liver-Confined Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients with Comorbidity Sun Hyun Bae, Young Seok Kim, Sang Gyune Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Jae Myeong Lee, Sanghyeok Lim, Jae Hong Jung, Chan Kyu Kim Cancers.2025; 18(1): 91. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Resection in Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jin-Soo Lee, Dong Ah Park, Seungeun Ryoo, Jungeun Park, Gi Hong Choi, Jeong-Ju Yoo Gut and Liver.2024; 18(4): 695. CrossRef
Achieving Sufficient Therapeutic Outcomes of Surgery in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients through Appropriate Selection Han Ah Lee Gut and Liver.2024; 18(4): 556. CrossRef
Intrahepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare tumor with poor prognosis due to its highly invasive
and metastatic nature and difficulty for early detection. The most common form of intrahepatic
sarcomatoid carcinoma is the sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, the development of which is
usually associated with previous treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, sarcomatoid
cholangiocarcinoma is extremely rare and results from spontaneous sarcomatoid transformation
during the development of tumor. Here, we report a case of sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma,
in a 58-year-old male, which developed at the site of previous treatment for hepatocellular
carcinoma. A 9 × 7 cm sized tumor which had not been detected in the computed tomography
exam 3 months before diagnosis was newly observed. The tumor rapidly progressed and the
patient died only 31 days after the diagnosis.
Despite recent advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis
of patients with extrahepatic metastasis from HCC still remains dismal. The current study
presents a case of HCC that was metastatic to the pelvis and describes successful treatment
with multidisciplinary approach to the skeletal metastasis. The patient was a 67-year-old
male who presented with right pelvic pain 28 months following right hepatectomy for HCC.
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging indicated a solitary bone metastasis
without intrahepatic recurrence. Complete response was achieved with multidisciplinary
management including sorafenib, transarterial embolization, surgery to remove the
metastatic mass and radiotherapy after surgery. A post-operative follow-up 15 months later
found that the patient remained in good health with maintained complete response. This case
suggests that a multidisciplinary approach can achieve long-term cancer-free survival and
prolonged life expectancy beyond palliative care for patients with solitary bone metastasis
after curative surgery for HCC.
Background/Aims Metronomic (MET) chemotherapy is a treatment characterized by
frequent infusion of low doses of chemotherapeutic agent without extended break. The aim
of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of MET chemotherapy compared with transarterial
chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with child B class advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC). Methods Seventy-three patients with child B class advanced HCC were analyzed between
April, 2007 and August, 2013 according to two treatment groups: (i) MET chemotherapy group
(n=43, Epirubicin 35 mg/body surface area [BSA] every 4 weeks, and cisplatin 15 mg/BSA and
5-fluorouracil 50 mg/BSA weekly for 3 weeks) via an implantable port system with 1 week
break. (ii) TACE group (n=30, Adriamycin 20-50 mg) every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was
overall survival (OS). Results The median survival times in the MET and TACE groups were 4.5 months and
3.1 months, respectively. The overall survival rate showed significantly better in the MET
treatment group than in the TACE group (P=0.039). When the factors affecting patient
OS were analyzed, MET chemotherapy (P=0.038, hazard ratio {HR} 0.538 [95% confidence
interval {CI} 0.299-0.967]) was independently associated with OS. Larger maximal tumor size,
extrahepatic metastasis and advanced stage also were significant factors for OS (P=0.009, HR
1.064 [95% CI 1.014-16.064]; P=0.014, HR 2.120 [95% CI 1.164-3.861]; P=0.019, HR 2.046 [95% CI
1.125-3.720], respectively). Conclusions MET chemotherapy showed survival benefit than TACE in patients with child
class B advanced HCC. Therefore, MET chemotherapy may be considered as a treatment
option for advanced HCC with poor liver function. (J Liver Cancer 2015;15:92-99)
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A comparative study of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma with poor liver function Hyun Yang, Hyun Young Woo, Soon Kyu Lee, Ji Won Han, Bohyun Jang, Hee Chul Nam, Hae Lim Lee, Sung Won Lee, Do Seon Song, Myeong Jun Song, Jung Suk Oh, Ho Jong Chun, Jeong Won Jang, Angelo Lozada, Si Hyun Bae, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2017; 23(2): 128. CrossRef