Journal of Liver Cancer

Recommendation and Guideline

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an expert consensus-based practical recommendation from the Korean Liver Cancer Association: Min-Su Park, Jai Young Cho, Eunju Kim, Hee Young Na, YoungRok Choi, Na Reum Kim, Young-In Yoon, Boram Lee, Eun Sun Jang, Yun Kyung Jung, Kyung Sik Kim; J Liver Cancer. 2025;25(2):140-159. Published online September 22, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2025.08.05

8,856 Views
116 Downloads
1 Web of Science
1 Citation

Compared with other treatments, surgical resection is an effective treatment method with the lowest local recurrence rate and the highest survival rate for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To achieve excellent results after surgical treatment, it is essential to carefully select patients who are suitable for hepatic resection and minimize postoperative complications and liver function decline through standardized surgical methods and pre- and postoperative management. However, domestic and international treatment guidelines only broadly recommend the application of hepatic resection for HCC with a single tumor and good liver function. Hence, practical treatment guidelines are required that can be standardized and used according to the varying clinical environments, including indications for hepatic resection, preoperative evaluation, basic principles of hepatic resection, minimally invasive hepatic resection, pre- and postoperative patient management, surgical treatment considerations in specific infection situations, and follow-up after surgical resection. Accordingly, an expert group from the Korean Liver Cancer Association Research Committee has developed practical recommendations based on expert consensus regarding the surgical treatment of HCC through a Delphi study.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Radiotherapy for Liver-Confined Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients with Comorbidity
Sun Hyun Bae, Young Seok Kim, Sang Gyune Kim, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Jae Myeong Lee, Sanghyeok Lim, Jae Hong Jung, Chan Kyu Kim
Cancers.2025; 18(1): 91. CrossRef

Special Contributions

Impact of the 2024 medical-policy conflict on hepatocellular carcinoma management in Korea: Soon Sun Kim, Hyun Yang, Jieun Kwon, Eunju Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Janghan Jung, Woosun Choi, Ji Eun Han, Moon Haeng Hur, Bo Hyun Kim, Sung Hyun Kim, Jeong Han Kim, Haeryoung Kim, Pyoung-Jae Park, Hyun Phil Shin, Su Jong Yu, Ki Tae Yoon, Sang Min Yoon, Minjong Lee, Jai Young Cho, Jin-Young Choi, Do Young Kim, June Sung Lee, Mi-Sook Kim, Kyung Sik Kim; J Liver Cancer. 2025;25(2):169-177. Published online September 2, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2025.09.01

3,239 Views
85 Downloads

Abstract PDF: In 2024, a nationwide conflict between the South Korean government and the medical community, the medical-policy conflict, profoundly impacted healthcare delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following this crisis. We analyzed retrospective real-world data from university hospitals in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, supplemented with national healthcare data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. The analytical variables included changes in workforce composition, initial treatment modalities, HCC stage distribution, quality indicators for HCC care, regional and institutional variations in care delivery, and liver transplantation (LT) volume. A comparison between 2023 and 2024 revealed a marked decline in the number of medical trainees, a rise in the proportion of physician assistants, a 28.9% reduction in newly initiated HCC treatments, and an increased rate of stage IV diagnoses. Several quality indicators, including rates of multidisciplinary care and patient education, declined. The volume of LTs decreased by approximately 20% nationwide, with some regions ceasing LT procedures. The results suggest that serious disruptions occurred in HCC care following the conflict. The significant decrease in initial treatment and number of LT procedures, more advanced stages at diagnosis, and declining quality metrics indicate the emergence of healthcare gaps. Without the recovery of the clinical workforce and the reestablishment of a stable healthcare delivery system, the management of serious diseases such as HCC will remain structurally vulnerable. National-level efforts are urgently required to address regional disparities and restore essential medical services.

Expert survey on systemic therapy indications for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: bridging clinical practice and reimbursement criteria: Hyun Yang, Soon Sun Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Jieun Kwon, Do Young Kim, Eunju Kim, Hyun Phil Shin, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Eileen L. Yoon, Sangheun Lee, Young Eun Chon, Janghan Jung, Jaekyung Cheon, Woosun Choi, Seul Ki Han, Ji Eun Han, Moon Haeng Hur, Hyun Woong Lee, Hyung Joon Kim; J Liver Cancer. 2025;25(2):160-168. Published online July 7, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2025.07.02

2,926 Views
106 Downloads

Abstract PDF: This survey aimed to collect expert opinions from multidisciplinary specialists involved in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea regarding real-world criteria for systemic therapy indications. In response to discrepancies between national reimbursement policies and clinical decision-making, members of the Korean Liver Cancer Association and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver participated in a web-based survey from February 4 to 14, 2025. A total of 89 respondents, primarily experienced clinicians, provided their views on major clinical scenarios including infiltrative HCC, bilobar multifocal disease, huge tumors, vascular invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness. There was high agreement for including infiltrative HCC (69.7%), suspected portal vein invasion (70.8%), and TACE refractoriness (82.0%) as systemic therapy indications. TACE refractoriness, in particular, aligns with current guideline definitions. Additionally, over half of respondents (51.7%) supported extrahepatic metastasis under similar conditions. Notably, multidisciplinary discussion was emphasized across scenarios, but many respondents also favored allowing primary physician discretion in select cases. This report provides consolidated expert input to inform future updates to reimbursement policies and promote alignment with real-world clinical practice. These findings may help bridge the gap between national coverage criteria and clinical decision in systemic therapy for HCC.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search